Emu.pl Is For Sale!


Code:
nielsenj@DuctTape:~$ whois emu.pl
% This is the NASK WHOIS Server.
% This server provides information only for PL domains.
% For more info please see http://www.dns.pl/english/whois.html

Domain object:
domain:	   emu.pl
registrant's handle: nta59643 (INDIVIDUAL)
nservers:	 ns1.sedoparking.com.
			  ns2.sedoparking.com.
created:		2006.03.10
last modified:  2006.03.22
registrar: NetArt
Zabawa 118
32-020 Wieliczka
Polska/Poland
+48.801 800 700
+48.12 4244010
biuro@nazwa.pl

option: the domain name has not option

				Subscribers Contact object: data restricted
registrar: NetArt
		Zabawa 118
32-020 Wieliczka
Polska/Poland
+48.801 800 700
+48.12 4244010
biuro@nazwa.pl




Whois database last updated: 2006.05.26

Is that Hando or no?

Losing domains to domain squatters makes me sad... happened to a site I used to frequent, and they had the nerve to ask $3200 for the domain.
 
If it is hando I'm sure he really appreciates his personal details being posted on this forum.

btw at
sam fisher said:
Either way the asking price is €1600!
Not even your mum costs that much!

User has been banned for this post
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Umm, yeah, if someone is offended by that post I can remove info, but that info is pretty much public record... just go to any whois site and type emu.pl.
 
It's not hando's (or anybody's) info.

Check out the WHOIS record: the only details you see are those of the REGISTRAR (which is the agency at which he registered the domain).

The only thing you see about the REGISTRANT (which is the owner, should be hando then but could be anybody) is the handle they use to identify him. That doesn't exactly say much, so I don't think this qualifies as personal information.
 
Javacat posted on May 27 2006 at 12:06 AM said:
If it is hando I'm sure he really appreciates his personal details being posted on this forum.

btw at
sam fisher said:
Either way the asking price is €1600!
Not even your mum costs that much!

User has been banned for this post

:lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Assuming it was Hando, it was a very rude thing to post. Sure, it is public information, but it isn't plastered everywhere either - you have to fill some forms to get it, it's the minimum to keep every leech from having access to it.

- Alex
 
RiX0R posted on May 27 2006 at 12:00 PM said:
It's not hando's (or anybody's) info.

Check out the WHOIS record: the only details you see are those of the REGISTRAR (which is the agency at which he registered the domain).

The only thing you see about the REGISTRANT (which is the owner, should be hando then but could be anybody) is the handle they use to identify him. That doesn't exactly say much, so I don't think this qualifies as personal information.
exactly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mudi posted on May 27 2006 at 10:32 AM said:
Umm, yeah, if someone is offended by that post I can remove info, but that info is pretty much public record... just go to any whois site and type emu.pl.

Don't bother :) There is no reason to do it :) Anyway long story short. Those are not my personal details and it's not me selling the domain. I just lost interest in emulation for PC (emu.pl was emulation news site) so decide not longer to pay for a domain. Somebody registered it and now is trying to get some bucks from it :) That's the whole story :) And you can easilly check my personal details just by doing whois on gp32x.de domain. Actually it's an old info as I currently live in Poznan not Sulechow but if you want to make some donation or send me some cool gift :) don't hesistate to ask me for my real adress ;) You can even see my photo in my profile :) Yeah, I'm open source person - availiable to everyone ;)))))
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hando posted on May 29 2006 at 10:15 PM said:
Yeah, I'm open source person
Are you only available under the GPL license? Or can we keep any changes done to you to ourselves?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Horscht posted on May 29 2006 at 10:22 PM said:
hando posted on May 29 2006 at 10:15 PM said:
Yeah, I'm open source person
Are you only available under the GPL license? Or can we keep any changes done to you to ourselves?
He is GPL'ed you have to release his updated source!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top