Overclocking With Power Adapter


thumpgun

Zombie club life member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
451
Age
87
Location
front of pc..
Website
Visit site
only post your overclocking speed results while using a AC adaptator, was wondering if you can get a higher more stable speed than you would with batteries.
 
Vimacs posted on Feb 22 2007 at 07:24 PM said:
you can probably get the best results using a 3,6v 1a psu, as that is what the chip is rated for.

i think the gp2x crashs at a higher clock speed due to your batteries and not your gp2x....then again im thicker than thicky mick thick, the thickest of the thick..... :blink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fatdad posted on Feb 22 2007 at 12:11 PM said:
Vimacs posted on Feb 22 2007 at 07:24 PM said:
you can probably get the best results using a 3,6v 1a psu, as that is what the chip is rated for.

i think the gp2x crashs at a higher clock speed due to your batteries and not your gp2x....then again im thicker than thicky mick thick, the thickest of the thick..... :blink:
Actually I think it's based off heat..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You may like to know that there's a DC DC convertor inside the gp2x for taking battery voltage of anything between 1.9V and 3.6V* and converting it to a usable internal voltage (3.7V), whereas the DC adaptor input seems to have no such convertor and is used "as is". Obviously the convertor will use a certain amount of current to power itself, but you may find that if you use a decent pair of batteries, the overclock is better than an adaptor (assuming most adaptors are 3V).

* - I don't know the exact range, but providing a 1.9V input directly to the battery compartment provided a perfectly working console. Mapping out the current vs voltage, it seemed that 3.7V was the most efficient.
 
Squidge posted on Feb 23 2007 at 12:00 AM said:
You may like to know that there's a DC DC convertor inside the gp2x for taking battery voltage of anything between 1.9V and 3.6V* and converting it to a usable internal voltage (3.7V), whereas the DC adaptor input seems to have no such convertor and is used "as is". Obviously the convertor will use a certain amount of current to power itself, but you may find that if you use a decent pair of batteries, the overclock is better than an adaptor (assuming most adaptors are 3V).

* - I don't know the exact range, but providing a 1.9V input directly to the battery compartment provided a perfectly working console. Mapping out the current vs voltage, it seemed that 3.7V was the most efficient.
does that mean that using a LiIon battery would be more efficient?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top