Search results

Wasn't there a codesourcery toolchain that could be dropped right into Code::Blocks? Seems like that's the best solution for C. Or you could just code in Python. ;)

I hate sites that limit everything to a teeny tiny column in the center. On 2048 or 2560 pixel wide monitors, 960 looks so small. :lol:

I think it's highly likely that supply will be below demand. ;)

Yep. Newegg is invaluable for finding out which products are flawed in some way. I have a 16GB A-Data too, and it works great. :)

That's what they said about Wiis. :P Probably even higher.

For Canada: 32GB Kingston - $79.99 + S&H 16GB A-Data - $35.99 + S&H

:huh: I'll wait, thx. No point rushing it. This latest revision has flaws that need to be addressed. I think craig and co should consider the possibility that someone may have to be sent over there to motivate them.

Wow... I'm so used to my horizontal res being over 2000. I don't have any serious browsing planned on an 800x480 screen. It's all games for me. ;)

Unfortunately, it tends to free the memory after my game crashes when I run out. ;) Someone needs to rethink how this works. There needs to be an API/daemon available that instructs programs on how they should behave. It should keep a list of how much memory the programs think they can free...

The only people worried about RAM usage are the ones accustomed to Windows programs using 150MB to open a text file. (hyperbole) I hate the bloat all these companies shovel out. I use freeware almost exclusively. My IM client uses about 5MB. My text editor uses about 1.5MB until I open...

Hehe... one of my DVDs is 856x480. It also has black bars encoded into the video. Only ~360 pixels have stuff on them. I wonder if 4:3 TVs would crop that or stretch? Probably crop?

I know many languages. It just comes down to what I'm comfortable and most experienced with. I've done enough C to know it's a pointless waste of time for me to write games in C, and yet that's what everyone seems to code them in. ;) Go figure. Perhaps I've been jaded by Javascript being my...

Oh man, I love IndestructoTank! :lol: I'd be willing to help - but there is one problem. My language is Java (not C), so I could port it to Java, but then it'd be dependant upon LWJGL. LWJGL will hopefully (probably) be ported to the Pandora, but there's no guarantees. Either way, it'd be more...

Umm... May 1st! :lol:

Don't forget a lot of those devices have the speed locked lower, and have more OS overhead. Quite frankly I'm amazed that the Pandora can still be faster with older chips. :P That's how amazingly fast it is. ;) (Yes, I'm trying to justify craig's statement)

Now that's a rather simplistic and negative view. It's far more likely that they're testing power consumption at different speeds. This is basically a cellphone SoC, after all. All the 720mhz ones probably consume less juice, so they bump them up to 720mhz, and then they're both equal. ;) Or...

This is true. Today I discovered the Dlink DWL-610 wireless card (Wireless B ) Only works with Linksys routers in Wireless B Only mode - not Mixed B/G mode. Go figure. ;) Works fine with DLink routers, though. An open driver might fix that - but for Windows there isn't any.

And I've been calling them apps for over a decade. My point was that I think of all programs as "Apps". Do they really have a trademark on "App Store"? I really hate names that are hard to pronounce and have no connection to actual words. Unless you know what they represent, and are fluent in...

Haha. :D I agree. He said for use in a conversation. If you say "The Box" to anyone that isn't familiar with the Pandora, they'll wonder wth you're talking about. The only good names suggested are appstore, download center, file forum, etc. I've been calling my apps "apps" since long...

54,000,000 bits would become 54 SI megabits, or 6.75 SI megabytes. (8 bits in a byte) To get MiB you need to divide by 1024 a few times. 54000000/(1024*1024*8) is only 6.437 MiB. But that doesn't factor in protocol overhead. Apparently 300mbit Wireless N is almost as fast as 100mbit wired. ;)...