It can be used as a cheap tint, but it doesn't need to be, it's also good for cheap water proofing, cheap durability, flexibility, cheap opacity (so less paint goes further). Good for all sorts of stuff! To bad it's illegal.
I really liked the tinymenu plugin on tiny screened / lower res devices as it lets you have all but one line of screen real estate available for content. I'm hoping there is something similar on whatever browser we end up with.
Edit: Should have said whatever browser ends up running well, as...
I'm a developer and I don't want paint (and the old cases seemed to work fine)
But, I understand if the OPT wants to wait for paint to get a better image of their product out there or whatever..
The GNU OS is different, they are still working on it, Linux is more like a fork. Someone (or a bunch of people) used what they had done (since it was supposed to be free), gave credit for what they used, added a whole bunch of stuff and gave it a new name. Isn't there a thread for this? :)
I have read FSF articles before (and linux users bashing windows never surprises me), I even write GPL software,
but that GNU/Linux one still took me by surprise. He really should redo that article.. It comes across really badly I think.
Sheesh, I was curious where this GNU/Linux thing originates and I came across this:
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html
Is it just me, or does he not come across very well at all in this article?
Yeah, I would say X is a good chunk of the OS too (if you use it). Anything that interfaces with the hardware is basically part of the operating system if you ask me. The O.S. is basically modular.
Edit: Since the kernel is usually the lowest common denominator, it serves as a nice reference...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.