Search results

I don't.

Don't think. Doesn't feel like it. I've seen an interview with an Indian scientist (Math or CS, I guess. I'd love to state his name, but don't remember). He explained how LLMs were inherently unable to check themselves. Dunno what it's worth, but it seemed plausible to me.

@netcat For instance, I asked - first stating what was inefficiently implemented in earlier versions to convey what I'm interested in - how the internal representation of data in FastDDS' DynamicData objects has changed, since I already knew they've completely overhauled their dynamic type...

I tried via chat customization instructions to make ChatGPT always make clear which is learned or scanned fact and which is its own conjecture. Didn't work so far. When I test this specifically and it fails, I interrogate to find out how my instructions failed. It always tells me those are fine...

Makes me think about, how Poettering got his mycelium into the main Linux distros and is now working for M$.

Hard to argue, that that's done to keep society safe.

I used ChatGPT to explain to me those obscure BIOS settings (more obscure than usual) in my network appliance. An Intel N100 device by HUNSN. It meant a lot of typing on my part, but otherwise it worked out great. Way better than searching online for what that shit means.

Use pain blockers.

@Null I don't get it. I was being serious. 1727029882 Ah. I was supposed to follow the link. Though, still I don't get how that's really a reply to my post.

That's what I would prescribe for rapists. I thought for thieves it was hands off.

There are training weights you can strap on and off as needed, you know.

Corporate shill!

Ah ok, you're talking about a merchant. Thought, it's about a shipping intermediate or something and that if they're few and far - like you'd have to travel all over Berlin - it must be rather special.

Of course it would. It's just difficult to predict, when and where it'll hit.

Probably. Must be some special shop. ?

@netcat Don't you have `sizeof` in C?

@kuru Often it's way more efficient to communicate where in memory something is than to copy said something (at every step). The error-prone tasks when dealing with pointers are - not to fuck up one's pointer arithmetic - always have a clear concept of pointer (or rather memory (per allocation))...

Where's the barfing emoji?

Don't be like that. They're just variables, who's values are addresses in memory.

Darn it's very repetitive and almost devoid of content - measured against the video's length. Are those facist groups he's talking about a problem? Sure they are and a huge one at that. But can he please stop equating them to the left. That's rather dishonest and cheap. Yes, left groups are what...