Wow... gee those were fast replies. Seriously though... why not? What's the point of the hardware being "community built" if no one will even consider hardware revisions for future revs of the handheld? I don't want people starting to think... "The Pandora is so 2008! That's so 2000-late."
No...
Hey guyz...
I know you have finalized the spec for the Pandora... but there is this kick-a** ARM that recently came out called the SnapDragon ARM by Qualcomm. This chip is set to go at 1 GHz standard, with higher clocks being a grand possibility. Would the OpenPandora team consider using this...
Well is there any consideration for adding this in the OpenPandora II? Nobody said this HAS to be on the very first model. After all, with the smashing success of the first model, I'm sure there will be room for improvement. With that in mind, I will (seriously) not buy a pandora until the next...
Wow... damn I started a flamefest. My bad, I wasn't intending to stir bad blood. I have a love for this hobbyist stuff and only want to help. I guess I came across as a chauvinistic douche bag and a supremest...
Guru
Excellent... but I think that money talks louder than words or just pure experience. ;)
True, experience is key here and I am not denying that, but if you really want to make a difference, you put your money where your mouth is. For all we know, some of the folks wanting a dev unit could be...
Sure... if you can hit me up with one that would be awesome.
Personally, I'd like to make a port of the D language compiler (GDC) work on a Pandora since that is my biggest goal. Another possibility is an EasySync app for the Pandora so that, if you have documents you want to keep in parallel...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.