Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says

From Pyra Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Our new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"


Super Bowl forecasts from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting


Share this post


No one can forecast the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With as much as date news and a small however tough 14 Billion parameter model, our AI is boldly predicting the unpredictable. Join us as we try to respond to mankind's most difficult concerns.


Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as 2 years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain numerous pressing concerns that are less easy to select. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be better at forecasting the future (and have seen some appealing enhancements - term paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.


For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!


Background


Our AI is a 14 billion criterion model which is really on the smaller side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from numerous months earlier so we have actually constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown area to make its best prediction possible.


And Now ... The Important Questions


We postured the following concerns to our AI and gauged its reaction. While we have actually seen forecast enhancements from our training, utilize these price quotes for prop wagering at your own danger.


Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 5% chance


Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta factor in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal ...


First, I'll take a look at the essential points from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even welcomed her buddies and household to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.


Some fans are excited, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has actually triggered some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.


I believe the key points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the chances and pyra-handheld.com his actions recommend it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low likelihood, maybe around 5%, thinking about all factors.


Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the very bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility


No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its just a various front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.


Alright, I'm trying to find out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it looks like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and technique.


Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to perform the relocation. The post mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is quite high. ... I likewise require to believe about the defensive techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they may change their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.


Considering that more than five looks like a considerable number however possible provided their self-confidence, I would estimate a probability around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, confidence in the strategy, and the possibility that they'll utilize it numerous times, specifically if it's effective early on.


Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show performance?


AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity


While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.


From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration during a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems significant because it reveals he's done it previously, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent short articles, it mentions that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That could suggest he's less most likely to address Trump this time.


However, he's likewise included in a fight with Drake, which may give him factors to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation suit from Drake, so maybe he's cautious about consisting of any controversial songs in the performance. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.


Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar may feel obliged to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations throughout the halftime program, so there's a danger that such content may be limited or softened.


On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong proceed big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which may provide him more innovative freedom. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.


But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could indicate he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion's context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, possibly around 65%.


Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 25% chance


Lets be honest, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the fact that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Looks like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.


From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't imply to cause offense which he really discovered it amusing himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might indicate he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.


Looking at the articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which recommends that he's an individual who enjoys consuming, especially with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the circumstance is on screen for a celebration.


Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?


AI Final Prediction: 50% chance


"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 incredibly bowls. Potentially lucrative? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can take place when that coin goes in the air.


Okay, so I'm trying to determine the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historical information that may affect this forecast.


First, I check out the posts provided. They all point out the historic stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has turned up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a slight edge, but it's not a substantial difference.


However, I bear in mind that the result of a coin toss is typically thought about random. The small historic edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, sometimes individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I ought to consider whether this historical predisposition must affect the possibility.


After thinking about it, I choose that while the historic information reveals a slight choice for tails, it's not statistically considerable enough to move the possibility away from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists but does not bypass the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.


Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity


We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably believe the same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI says the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!


AI Reasoning:


Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of posts that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful employ current video games, particularly the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.


But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "ridiculous." They say there's no evidence of systematic predisposition. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it may suggest there's no real basis or they would have resolved it in a different way if there was some fact to it.


Looking at the short articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also discussed that statistical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have been penalized more given that 2022. That's intriguing due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer charges, right?


...


So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely very low. Maybe not zero since you can't dismiss every possibility, but incredibly not likely.


Summary


There you have it everybody, is it even worth enjoying the video game still? I have to wait and see how the game turns out before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent video game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was wrong about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.