Hi Nikolaus,
On 2018년 06월 14일 18:58, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Hi Roger and Chanwoo,
Am 14.06.2018 um 10:34 schrieb Roger Quadros rogerq@ti.com:
On 14/06/18 04:20, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 2018년 06월 11일 17:53, Roger Quadros wrote:
Chanwoo,
On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Hi Tony, another bug...
[ 174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002 [ 174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c bmp280 bmc150_accel_core [ 174.624601] bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea] [ 174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G W 4.17.0-letux+ #2408 [ 174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree) [ 174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect [ 174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c) [ 174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84) [ 174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694) [ 174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc) [ 174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4) [ 174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158) [ 174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c) [ 174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550) [ 174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4) [ 174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger]) [ 174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger]) [ 174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238) [ 174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120) [ 174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60) [ 174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap]) [ 174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap]) [ 174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68) [ 174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c) [ 174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c) [ 174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464) [ 174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec) [ 174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150) [ 174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode? The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or
I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer. Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()? if yes why?
To reduce the latency of notification is important of extcon.
So, extcon used the spinlock before calling the notifier_call_chain to prevent the scheduled out for a moment. Also, the notifier_call calls the registered notifier function sequentially. It means that if some registered notifier function spends a lot of time, the next registered notifier might receive the notification with a delay. So, extcon used the spinlock. Unitl now,
But, as you commented and previously, sometimes it caused the similar issues. (To fix similar issues, the consumer device used the workqueue)
I will call notifier function without spinlock as following and I'll consider the other way to notify the changed state to consumer device with broadcasting way.
diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c index 8bff5fd18185..1e35b8ca3951 100644 --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c @@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id) return index;
spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
state = !!(edev->state & BIT(index));
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags); /* * Call functions in a raw notifier chain for the specific one@@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id) */ raw_notifier_call_chain(&edev->nh_all, state, edev);
spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);Thanks Chanwoo.
Nikolaus, could you please test this patch and give your Reported-by/Tested-by sign off? Thanks.
I have tested on the Pyra handheld prototype and now it works. Plugging in an OTG cable enables/disables OTG power as expected and there are no kernel oops any more.
So you can add my Reported-by/Tested-by.
Thanks for the test. But, you have to reply your reported/tested-by tag to patch[1] because all tags should be remained on lkml. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/2