Hi Tony,
Am 28.11.2017 um 17:04 schrieb Tony Lindgren tony@atomide.com:
- H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com [171128 15:52]:
We can remove the unnecessary "omapdss," prefix because the omapdrm driver takes care of it when matching with the driver table.
So is this needed as a fix or is this another clean-up?
So is this is really needed as a fix?
Hm. How do you differentiate between "fix" and "cleanup"? Maybe it is more a wording than a content issue...
For me it is a "fix" because it is semantically wrong to have a prefix where it is not needed. And "fixing" it changes the compiler output by 8 bytes.
"Cleanup" would be for me removing whitespace or empty lines or typos in comments.
If this is just clean-up, again, please resend once the driver changes have cleared.
There is no change to the pandora driver involved here. The Pandora panel driver is already correct. Just the DTS has some redundant content which should be removed.
So there is no dependency for this patch.
BR, Nikolaus
Regards,
Tony
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi index 53e007abdc71..64d967ec8c58 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@
lcd: lcd@1 { reg = <1>; /* CS1 */
compatible = "omapdss,tpo,td043mtea1";
spi-max-frequency = <100000>; spi-cpol; spi-cpha;compatible = "tpo,td043mtea1";
-- 2.12.2