* H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com [161025 10:20]:
Am 25.10.2016 um 18:51 schrieb Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com:
On 10/25/2016 07:48 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi index b04adee..91456b4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ compatible = "ti,abe-twl6040"; ti,model = "omap5-uevm";
ti,jack_detection;ti,jack-detection
Hm. Looks as if we have found another bug: which one is correct?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documen...
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/sound/s...
Should I add another patch?
We have parts of omap-abe-twl6040.txt, the driver and omap4-sdp.dts all using ti,jack-detection. So omap-abe-twl6040.txt is wrong for the use of ti,jack_detection.
Regards,
Tony