On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 22:46:49 +0200 "H. Nikolaus Schaller" hns@goldelico.com wrote:
Hi,
Am 06.09.2019 um 05:01 schrieb Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org:
On 05-09-19, 07:32, Tony Lindgren wrote:
- H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com [190904 08:54]:
This adds code and tables to read the silicon revision and eFuse (speed binned / 720 MHz grade) bits for selecting opp-v2 table entries.
Since these bits are not always part of the syscon register range (like for am33xx, am43, dra7), we add code to directly read the register values using ioremap() if syscon access fails.
This is nice :) Seems to work for me based on a quick test on at least omap36xx.
Looks like n900 produces the following though:
core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1270000 maxuV: 1270000, not supported by regulator cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (550000000)
That's a DT thing I believe where the voltage doesn't fit what the regulator can support.
I can confirm this on BeagleBoard C2:
root@gta04:~# dmesg|fgrep -i opp [ 2.347442] core: _opp_supported_by_regulators: OPP minuV: 1270000 maxuV: 1270000, not supported by regulator [ 2.359222] cpu cpu0: _opp_add: OPP not supported by regulators (550000000) [ 2.580993] omap2_set_init_voltage: unable to find boot up OPP for vdd_core root@gta04:~#
But presumably that can be further patched.
Well, the opp-v1 table also has this voltage point:
/* OMAP343x/OMAP35xx variants OPP1-5 */ operating-points = < /* kHz uV */ 125000 975000 250000 1075000 500000 1200000 550000 1270000 600000 1350000 >;This is OPP4 which is recommended by OMAP3530 data sheet to be 1.27V +/- 5%
Data sheet of tps65950 says
• VDD1: 1.2-A, buck DC/DC converter (VOUT = 0.6 V to 1.45 V, in steps of 12.5 mV)
This means 1270 mV is not a "step" and rejected by the twl4030 driver. Maybe nobody did notice yet because the opp-v1 drivers did not warn...
The reason probably is that errors about supported voltages were handled incorrecly in opp code in former times. Then someone fixed and cpufreq did not work on omap3 at all due to twl-regulator not specifying voltages for VDD1. Then I did a fix "regulator: twl: voltage lists for vdd1/2 on twl4030" which is still living in linux-next/pending-fixes (and probably also in Nikolaus's trees). Mark Brown did apparently not send his pull request.
As a side effect of all that voltage checking corrections these errors are unveiled.
Regards, Andreas