Hi Paul,
Am 27.02.2020 um 15:57 schrieb Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net:
Hi Nikolaus,
Le mer., févr. 26, 2020 at 12:16, H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com a écrit :
From: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan prasannatsmkumar@gmail.com This patch brings support for the JZ4780 efuse. Currently it only exposes a read only access to the entire 8K bits efuse memory and the ethernet mac address for the davicom dm9000 chip on the CI20 board. It also changes the nemc reg range to avoid overlap. Tested-by: Mathieu Malaterre malat@debian.org Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan prasannatsmkumar@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre malat@debian.org Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com
arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi index f928329b034b..1e266be28096 100644 --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ nemc: nemc@13410000 { compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nemc";
reg = <0x13410000 0x10000>;
reg = <0x13410000 0x4c>;This is wrong, the real size of the register area is 1x15c.
It should not overlap with the efuse reg range which is:
<0x134100d0 0x2c>
If I look at JZ4780 Mobile Application Processor Programming Manual section 16.4.1 Register Description Table 16-4 Static Memory Interface Registers, I see
SMCR1 at 0x13410014 and SACR6 at 0x13410048 and all 32 bits wide. I.e. a total size of 0x4c.
Ah, now I see. There is also Table 16-5 NAND Flash Interface Registers starting with NFCSR at 0x13410050 and ending with TGHH register at 0x13410154.
Hm. With this we are probably at "go back and start over"...
Either nemc must be separated into two drivers for Static Memory and one for NAND Flash. Or must become able to handle two register ranges.
Or the e-fuse driver must become a part of the nemc driver.
Well, another assumption is that there is no NAND driver. AFAIR it was even removed from the kernel because the maintainer did say it is not fixable (if I really remember correctly).
#address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <1>; ranges = <1 0 0x1b000000 0x1000000@@ -373,6 +373,21 @@ status = "disabled"; };
- efuse: efuse@134100d0 {
compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-efuse";reg = <0x134100d0 0x2c>;clocks = <&cgu JZ4780_CLK_AHB2>;clock-names = "ahb2";As explained in my response to the other patch, 'clock-names' can go away.
Yes.
BR, Nikolaus