DaveC posted on Mar 4 2007 at 07:41 AM said:
Why? No one buys these things for the same PSP 3D widescreen type games. Different market. They buy them mostly for emulation and ports of PC games. A fancy 3D chip would do nothing for that. All it would need to be is the same screen, same form factor as the GP2X except have a D-pad, more RAM and a faster CPU.
That's because they can't handle them
It isn't a different market at all - a 3D accelerator would allow the existing (rather small) market to grow as a lot of the older systems could benefit from offloading some stuff to that and it would open the market to people who are interested in PlayStation emulators and a
lot more PC ports. I don't think you really understand what creates the limits for the GP2X - a lack of RAM isn't really a problem for most things right now. Same thing with CPU speed, though obviously more would be better for a few things.
Along with that, you'd be surprised how many people buy it as an embedded ARM Linux machine, not for playing games at all. I've seen a few on #gp2xdev. I won't even bother to comment on the 'same screen' thing because I know you tend to get really agressive if anybody suggests a different screen would be better :rolleyes:.
I don't see why everybody is so desparate to write the XGP off. If it were just a case of everybody coming to the realisation that it wasn't going to come out, that would be more normal than several threads
asking for the XGP to be vapourware! Are people scared of it or something? Something does seem a bit odd about the whole thing. We were having updates fairly regularly at one point but then the only person who had any kind of communication with GP was banned...
Personally, I think GP and GPH are actually the same company anyway (didn't it turn out that the largest shareholder in both companies was the same person?). They probably split to try and keep their vetures separate so that there was little risk of one failure costing the whole company money.